LinkedIn Banishing Rapportive From Google Apps

Rapportive is a genius Google Apps application that actually found a way to make social networking easier.  To date, that has not been an easy thing to do. But somehow Rapportive nailed it.  Installed as a browser extension, the Gmail app searches for social network profiles that contain the email address of the email you happen to be reading.  Rapportive returns a mashup of the existing profiles.  Not only that, Rapportive makes it easy to friend, connect, and follow that individual. You can invite the person to socialize with the simple click of a button.


More important, Rapportive appealed to nerdier users who discovered it could be used for email verification. As Boolean Blackbelt Blogger Glen Cathey pointed out to recruiters and internet sourcers, Rapportive verifies an email address when it returns the social profiles and profile photo of the person you’re trying to reach as shown in the screenshot below.

Rapportive Screen Shot


Well, my friends, as of tomorrow a Rapportive app that sits inside Gmail will be gone for good.  LinkedIn says it is doing away with the “Rapportive contextual gadget for Google Apps”.  LinkedIn’s  announcement spells out the social network’s reasoning.

Changes to Rapportive: Rapportive Raplets, Notes, and Contextual Gadget to be discontinued

At LinkedIn, we want to provide a simple and useful experience for members like you. From time to time, we take a closer look at how our features are being used by our members. On July 31, 2014, we’ll be removing 3 features from our Rapportive experience: Raplets, Notes, and the Rapportive contextual gadget for Google Apps. Please note: We are only removing these 3 features. Rapportive will continue to exist as a standalone product. By removing these features, we’re able to simplify the Rapportive experience. 

In other words, if you have Rapportive installed and if its the contextual gadget, that app will vanish from your inbox  Thursday, July 31st.  That’s tomorrow. If you are a Rapportive user who entered notes in the application you should immediately download your data.  LinkedIn will be disappearing your notes along with the Rapportive Google Apps application.

Rapportive Chrome Extension


So why, exactly, is LinkedIn doing this?  For one thing, since LinkedIn acquired Rapportive it can do whatever it damned well pleases with the app. For another, LinkedIn it is taking the Rapportive app away so that it can give us more . . . LinkedIn

 We’re adding a deeper integration with LinkedIn so you’ll see more LinkedIn profile information and your shared connections within Rapportive. We’re also making changes to improve the product’s speed and reliability.

 While giving us greater speed and reliability is always a good ting, more LinkedIn is not what Rapportive users signed up for before the LinkedIn acquisition of Rapportive. Killing off a perfectly functional app raises concerns about the underlying motivations of LinkedIn. Rapportive serves up an impartial mashup of social profiles and data. Unlike Rapportive, the startup, LinkedIn is not an impartial player in the social networking ecosystem. The more LinkedIn controls or blocks access to  member contact information and to other social networks, the more it forces us to use LinkedIn to do our networking. By throttling access, LinkedIn monetizes its business by creating demand for its paid services.

We always want what we cannot have.

 LinkedIn ‘s greatest strength is also its greatest weakness.  It is and must always remain a social network : that is the construct. So when it says or does things that run contrary to its social networking raison d’etre, member trust is shaken. I don’t object to LinkedIn monetizing its business. I object to LinkedIn behavior that contradicts its stated purpose as a social network.

For instance, LinkedIn has done things that suggest is has set a strategy to make it hard for members to share data with the very people with whom they want to share it. They block and impede access in a variety of ways.  For instance, LinkedIn doesn’t let members export phone numbers that first degree connections have shared with us.  While you can see the shared phone number sitting right in front of you in the LinkedIn profile online, there is no easy way to get it out of LinkedIn.  And that’s not all. Take a gander at the personal details that your connections have chosen to share with you in the Contact Information section of their profile. There you’ll find multiple email addresses and phone numbers, IM aliases, hyperlinked Twitter usernames , linked websites, homepages, and blogs. You’ll find members birthdates and LinkedIn profile URL.  Yet LinkedIn limits the export to its stripped down version of “name, rank, and serial number.”  It only allows the export of just four fields:

Note: Only the full name, email address, current employer, and position are exported. 

To be clear, when they say “email address” they mean it in the singular sense. Though a LinkedIn connection has shared multiple personal and work emails, the export spits out  just one email address. In other words, Linkedin’s has instituted a lockdown on basic contact information that a first degree connection has actually shared with you. Moreover, by refusing to give us an easy way to get that information into the places where we actually do our work, LinkedIn is actually making it harder for us to network.

That’s an odd thing for a social network to do. Unless, deep down, they’re not really a social network after all. 

Social networking suggests a relationship with give-and-take. Yet, LinkedIn is more a one-way street.  While LinkedIn has blocked access to data members actually want to share, the social network allegedly has dipped into member data that it shouldn’t have. In fact, some members are suing LinkedIn for the improper use of their data.  In June, a judge refused to dismiss the lawsuit against LinkedIn, which claims the company violated customers’ privacy rights for marketing purposes.  The suit alleges LinkedIn did so by accessing their external email accounts and downloading their contacts’ addresses.

LinkedIn is also cutting off member access to  job opportunities.  Because LinkedIn monetizes its network through recruitment services, the company refuses to give other recruiting solutions access to data that members want to share. Moreover, LinkedIn is a Goliath that is willing to go to court to sue emergent recruiting solutions.   In January, HR Examiner reported, ” Linkedin filed a lawsuit against unknown defendants claiming that someone was creating fake accounts so they could exceed Linkedin’s allotted page view limits and take information from user profiles. Linkedin claims unauthorized use of Linkedin’s computers, copyright violations, and breach of its Terms and Conditions. A copy of the lawsuit is here.”  The article goes on to say that LinkedIn amended the suit  in March and named two defendants, HiringSolved and SellHack. Matt Charney, one of the owners of SellHack, contends SellHack was not doing anything illegal.  LinkedIn states our “obligations” as members include the following:

You still own what you own, but you grant us a license to the content and/or information you provide us.

Did you know you were granting a licensing ALL of the information you provide to LInkedIn? Didn’t think so. That flegal sleight of hand  is what inspired employment lawyer Heather Bussing to “kill” her LinkedIn account.  So far, her rejection of LinkedIn is an outlier. Yet trust is a tricky thing.  As the author of the Cluetrain Manifesto David Weinberger  has written, social networks consist of small pieces loosely joined. It is a kind of connection, that while infinitely scaleable, remains incredibly fragile.